The Anatomy of People Powered Campaigns

People bring power and value to campaigns with vision, collaboration, data and nimble action.

people-powered campaigns

Every campaign starts with a strong vision of where we want to go. Exceptional campaigns do more than tell a compelling story. They value every individual’s unique potential to achieve something greater than they ever could manage on their own, and they build collective power in the process.

These campaigns give people the information they need to inspire others, react quickly to changing times, avoid obstacles and seize opportunities.

Campaigners need a mix of these four ingredients to build successful people-powered campaigns:

Beating Heart

Story

Supporters are the heroes of our campaigns, embarking on journeys that truly impact issues over time. Organizations play a strategic role in defining challenges and presenting clear theories of change, but the story of our campaigns is ultimately created and told by individuals—through the words, pictures, videos and actions that they share with their networks and the world to influence targets and grow campaigns. Therefore, our communications should consistently reflect our role as mentor, enabler and aggregator of supporters’ action.

Effective narratives are built to travel and are carried by people who validate our message using their own words and take them to places we could not reach directly or on our own.

Many Hands

Real Work

People-powered campaigns can only succeed with strategic contributions by individuals, activists and volunteers—online and offline—that shift the balance of power in our favor. These campaigns would literally be impossible to win with staff efforts alone. We embrace the notion that while staff contribute unique and essential expertise to campaigns, the collective skills and talents among millions of volunteers and supporters can be far greater. One of the most valuable roles staff can play is enabling and empowering activists and volunteers to contribute their greatest talents to create change.

Wide Eyes, Open Ears

Data

We use all available data to make our campaigns smarter and to build better relationships with supporters, activists and new audiences. We determine what data we need to make decisions, and if it’s not being captured yet, we figure out how to get it. We analyze data in order to understand the best points of entry and trends for an online and/or public dialogue; to engage with supporters based on their complete histories and influence; to test our hypotheses; and to evaluate our performance.

Fast Feet

Iterative

We run our campaigns at the speed of the internet—responding to real-world events as they occur, and adapting to changing times to meet people where they’re at. To do this, we embrace nimble, lightweight and low-friction structures and processes that enable talented staff to seize opportunities as they arise (and more quickly than our targets), supported by responsive, accountable management.

Successful people-powered campaigns emulating these four principles above are typically achieved through “integrated” mobilization teams or efforts—individuals coming together from a cross-section of skills, expertise or departments to plan and execute campaigns that put people at the center. For more, see the Mobilisation Integration Toolkit.

Source: MobLab

The 21st-Century Advocacy Playbook

Use this checklist to assess your team’s readiness to campaign in the modern landscape.

It takes a continued focus, resources and time to build strong advocacy campaign teams and engagement cultures that are up to the task of creating change in the modern landscape.

Strategic Vision

  • We have identified the root causes of problems we want to change. Whether we tackle them directly or indirectly, we know the beast we’re fighting.
  • We recognise the crucial role people power will have in transformational change to achieve our mission. We create opportunities for people to help shape the future in both the short and long term.
  • We have a long term Theory of Change that identifies the role people play in our mission; it’s easily communicated and inspires commitment.
  • We know who we have to reach in order to grow our organisation and have impact on our issues, and we understand the differences between these groups and their role in our work.
  • We have clearly defined objectives for engagement that are based on the role of people to strengthen the organisation and achieving change.
  • We regularly draw on research from supporters to inform decisions and to develop / create campaign projects.
  • We monitor changing opinions and events about our organisation and the issues we work on. We adapt our work to reflect current trends and take advantage of opportunities for change.

People Power

Building participation starts with a strong vision of where we want to go. The effective engagement need to have a clear and credible vision of the role people will play in making change happen.

  • Everyone in the organisation has a common understanding of the strategic role and potential of people power to contribute to our mission.
  • Everyone in the organisation recognises the role of people power to grow and strengthen the organisation.
  • Everyone in the organisation feels responsibility for achieving engagement objectives and milestones.

Storytelling

Stories have the power to shift attitudes, values, behaviors and societal norms. If we want to change the world, we need the stories by which we make sense of the world and inspire others to join with us taking action.

  • The stories we tell debunk old stories that aim to control people through fear and maintain the status quo.
  • The stories we tell provide evidence, hope and belief that another world is possible.
  • The story we tell about our work clearly states why we work for change, what we believe in, and what that mission is.
  • The story we tell puts people at the centre as the heroes of our work and reinforces the power of participation.
  • We provide opportunities, encouragement and tools for supporters to retell the story in their own voice and with their own pictures, videos and actions.
  • We add weight to and amplify the stories and actions of others using our organisational channels.

Engaging People

Creating change in the world requires courageous acts. Signing a petition will not alone be enough to stop climate change. Making a donation will not save all the forests. Every one of us will need to find the courage to do things we have never done before to shape the future.

  • We identify actions that supporters can take to leverage their power and influence.
  • We regularly use the engagement pyramid or a similar tool to plan “asks” that encourage supporters to step out of their comfort zones and take more courageous acts.
  • We know what actions supporters have already taken, and we tailor communications and asks to recognise prior contributions.
  • We know what supporters expect of us and what they need from us to maintain their current level of commitment and take on more courageous acts.
  • We provide connection between supporters so that they can find greater courage from being part of a community working for a better world.

Working With Allies

By working in collaboration with allies and partners, we can achieve more than we would be able to achieve on our own. Our allies bring different perspectives, knowledge, skills and networks, and this diversity makes us stronger as a movement. Also by working with diverse partners, we will be more effective at addressing the root causes of problems that have diverse impacts on society.

While coalition work can often be challenging, building strong relationships, trust and agreeing clear roles and responsibilities will create a foundation of cooperation that will last beyond individual projects and demonstrates living our values through shared responsibility.

  • We work with allies and partners at a strategic level identifying common and complementary objectives, including seeking potential partnerships outside of our ‘comfort zone’ to tackle the root causes of problems. While we may take different paths, we recognise that we all have a unique and important role in bringing about change.
  • Working with partners and allies takes work, collaboration and compromise. We work with allies to find solutions that strengthens both of our work to achieve our common purpose.
  • Co-creation is the primary way we plan and implement projects with allies, including strategies, activities, communications and engagement asks. We do not take decisions that would affect the coalition without consultation.
  • We have clear and specific agreements when working with allies and partners on projects about responsibilities, contributions, data sharing and decision-making and we live up to these agreements.
  • We are transparent with our allies and understand this is key to building trusting and lasting coalitions. We invite allies to internal meetings, skillshares and trainings and are open with them about our own needs and challenges.
  • We are there for our allies when they need us most, either helping behind the scenes, amplifying their work or standing beside them adding our voice to theirs as needed.
  • We play to our strengths when working in coalitions. This may mean dedicating staff time, equipment or resources. Or it could be contributing expertise, skills, networks and knowledge. While contributions may vary, we recognise the unique contributions of all our allies and give credit where it is due.

Experimentation and Innovation

We run our campaigns at the speed of the internet. It is not enough to merely follow trends; we need to consistently develop new ways of engaging more people for greater impact. We need to disrupt the old systems that are holding people back. We need to support new forms of collaboration that will create a radically positive future.

  • Leadership recognises that engagement is an evolving area of expertise. They support innovation through experimentation and learning.
  • Our team identifies opportunities for experimentation and learning as part of planning.
  • We allocate adequate time, space and resources to create and develop new ideas for engaging people with greater depth and breadth.
  • Our team has defined areas where risk is encouraged. There is a clear process for evaluating risk and weighing these against the potential learning and benefits.
  • We regularly create lightweight or zero cost prototypes to get immediate feedback before we start designing or building anything.
  • We get new ideas out the door quickly with minimum fuss so that we can measure results and learn from them.

Communications Channels

This is where our work comes to life for audiences and supporters. It is a living interconnected ecology of communications channels where we interact with audiences, adapt to changing technologies and trends and evolve to take advantage of opportunities and engage audiences.

  • Our team has a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of different channels and matches projects and tactics to complementary tools for reaching and engaging target audiences.
  • Storytelling is planned, coordinated and consistent across channels over time while content is adapted for effective outcomes by channel and project.
  • Each channel used by our team has a clearly defined target audience by project and role for engagement.
  • Content is written and/or designed for target audiences in a human voice and personalised for audiences based on their potential or past contributions.
  • Our team is responsive to supporters and potential supporters across channels encouraging conversation with and among audiences.
  • Our team is responsive to current events and changes within campaigns with timely content across appropriate channels.

Data

We use all available data to make our work smarter and build better relationships. We determine what data we need to make decisions and analyze data to adapt and improve performance.

  • We have identified and track metrics that reveal the quality of engagement as well as growth.
  • Project teams have identified and track metrics that reflect their theory of change and measure progress.
  • We conduct regular A/B testing across digital channels that starts from a hypothesis; results are based on conversion and account for statistical significance.
  • Our senior management and project teams have access to dashboards that track KPIs for the organization and campaign projects.
  • We have a regular process for analyzing, discussing and applying results including data visualization techniques to aid analysis and the results of these are regularly reported to senior management.
  • Decisions are based on multiple sources of data and testing, and we adapt our work based on real time data to be more effective at reaching and engaging people.
  • Senior management regularly assess the metrics we’re tracking to ensure that we’re incentivizing behaviors that lead to meaningful results and impact.

Digital and Data Infrastructure

Digital technologies are constantly evolving. We provide a reliable foundation that allows us to explore and evaluate opportunities to improve engagement while having the flexibility to experiment with new technologies before mainstreaming them.

  • We track KPIs related to campaign and organizational goals.
  • We share reports across all departments via dashboards or other easily accessible formats.
  • We have access to 360 degree supporter data and are using analytics tools to track supporter activities from entry point through to different conversion levels.
  • We regularly test new technologies and tools to assess their potential and share the results with leadership and project teams.
  • We track industry trends and standards and keep pace with technology advances relevant to our work (e.g. mobile responsiveness, search engine optimization).
  • Data collection is consistent and syncs across all key systems.
  • We have a consistent and appropriate implementation of privacy, security and ethical data use policies across all systems and the office has a recorded history of permissions granted by individual supporters.

Engagement Capacity and Culture

Our team members possess a breadth of knowledge in engagement as well as deep expertise in their area of concentration. We have the ability to collaborate across disciplines and to understand and interpret the context for strategic planning and implementation.

  • We have a collaborative culture in the team. We regularly build on each others’ ideas and provide constructive feedback to find better solutions that recognize the needs of all team members.
  • We take a creative approach to problem solving that brings everyone along and creates commitment to the solution at the same time.
  • We have a deep commitment to learning and broadening our skills. We embrace uncertainty and seek new experiences.
  • We are advocates for supporters and seek out ways to harness the collective intelligence of supporters, allies and other key audiences.
  • We have dedicated staff for data management and analysis. We review performance against KPIs and identify successes and opportunities for optimization in real time.
  • Teams that comprise engagement (e.g. fundraising, volunteers) are all represented equally in organization leadership.
  • Teams that comprise engagement (e.g. fundraising, volunteers) are all represented equally in campaign strategy and project planning.
  • Team members do not avoid conflict; we openly discuss competing needs and find ways to resolve problems together.

Article by MobLab. Top photo by Andres Arias on Unsplash.

Using Facebook for Organizing

Facebook remains a social network that large segments of the population use daily and therefore cannot be dismissed as an organizing tool. For groups needing to reach out and build their base and mobilize people to come out to events, Facebook remains an important part of an organizer’s toolkit.

Given that the conventional ways that organizations have used Facebook to reach out (through a Facebook Page), are generating diminishing reach (since Facebook changed its algorithm), it’s important to explore how groups are making tactical use of the network through the platform’s Groups option.

Impact

One of the big returns of using Facebook Groups, vs. Pages, is that it helps campaigners get around the changes to Facebook’s algorithm, which now offers very low reach to Page followers unless paid advertising is used.

In terms of pure organizing benefits, using Facebook groups allows campaigners to:

  • Recruit new supporters by reaching out where people naturally spend their time
  • Establish a channel for rapid sharing daily/weekly actions and wins
  • Efficient setup and management of events via Facebook Calendar
  • Rapid member communication via groups and/or Facebook Messenger

When this might not work for you

Privacy and security issues

If privacy is a BIG issue given your campaigning context (see guide on digital security) then think twice before using Facebook.

Members with privacy concerns may not feel safe joining public discussions. In some areas, group members hesitate to use Facebook for fear of retribution by employers, local police or trolls who may see their Facebook activities.

If you want all members to be able to weigh in, consider using other channels.

If group work is your main activity…

On Facebook, conversations tend to be cluttered and scroll off the screen quickly. For group coordination or planning, use a limited-membership mailing list or a collaboration tool like Slack.

What this requires

Staff that can use their personal Facebook accounts to set up a group and moderate it

  • One person with a personal Facebook account needs to initiate a Group and serve as the Admin
  • Ideally, a few people should share the ongoing posting and moderation duties

Setup steps

Choosing the right group option and activating your group

  • Closed Facebook groups can be found by search engines but they hide much of the group’s information, including posts, events, files and photos. However, the group’s member roster is visible. Members can post anything they want in the group without their friends and families seeing it. Closed groups are great for recruiting and for member communication and coordination. However, closed groups are poor for outreach because events and other information cannot be shared outside the group.
  • Secret Facebook groups cannot be found by search engines or by searching on Facebook and give an extra layer of privacy. The member roster, posts, photos and all other group information is completely private and only visible to members. This makes secret groups a good choice for groups that need extra security or for team leads to coordinate.
  • Public Facebook groups are easy to find and join, but members’ identities and posts are not protected at all, making it a poor choice for Indivisible groups. For example, when a member posts something to an open group it may be automatically shared with their friends and family on Facebook, potentially alienating those who don’t share their beliefs.
  • Consider a multi-group strategy. Many Indivisible groups have multiple Facebook groups for different purposes. The most popular strategy is to create a Facebook page for outreach and a closed Facebook group for members. Another approach is to create a closed Facebook group for members and a secret Facebook group for leadership. These are good strategies for groups that embrace Facebook but do not want to deal with other, less mainstream solutions like Slack. Keep in mind that managing multiple Facebook groups will require more dedicated Facebook admins, and will make some tasks more complicated, like posting the same event or action in multiple groups.

Set up a group admin team responsible for management

Consistency is the key for groups of all sizes, and having the right team managing your group’s Facebook presence is essential. Every group should choose a Facebook admin or admins (using their personal accounts) and set the volume of Facebook activity to a level that can be maintained over time. The admin(s) will be responsible for:

  • Updating page/group info
  • Publishing content
  • Managing the calendar
  • Moderating group content
  • Vetting member requests

Vet New Members

It is vital that you vet requests to join your Facebook group. You may not want information shared within your closed Facebook group to be distributed externally and you certainly want to avoid internet trolls that seek to harass and bully people online. In some cases, exposing your group to a malicious outsider can even be a safety issue.

Here are some strategies for vetting people who request to join:

  • Know them. Only let people in who you or another member knows personally.
  • Meet them. Only allow people to join after they have attended a local meeting.
  • Make sure they’re local. Many groups want to keep membership restricted to their city, district, or region. Ask applicants for their city or zip code and redirect them to other local groups if necessary.
  • Ground rules. Post the criteria for joining the group and a Code of Conduct or Posting Guidelines. You can make accepting the Ground rules a prerequisite to joining a group. As in, users must answer question fields when they select “request to join”. The answers are then given to mods to approve/disapprove.

Maintain High Quality Posts & Post Regularly

Group admins are responsible for creating and editing group posts and events, and making sure they are high-impact and capture the attention of members.

  • Facebook Etiquette / Code of Conduct.Clearly state the type of information that your group should and should not post. For example, many groups instruct members not to post fake news, not to vent, not to “go low,” and sometimes even not to post mainstream news articles. Trigger warnings and content warnings have become super commonplace in feminist/anti-racist community organizing groups.
  • Include photos or images in posts whenever possible because they are statistically more engaging and Facebook’s algorithm values them higher, which means more people will see them. Photos are great but you can also create custom images with text and graphics with a simple design tool such as Canva.
  • Videos get the most views and engagement. Some groups have found that they get the most engagement by creating short action videos, like a 15-second clip of people speaking out in response to a local elected official’s question or position on a topic. Facebook’s algorithm promotes video and Facebook Live above all other forms of content. If possible, include subtitles in your posting since many users view Facebook videos with audio turned off. Try to upload the video files to Facebook rather than posting a link to the video on another platform, like YouTube. Facebook prioritizes natively-uploaded videos rather than links to videos on other sites.
  • Post daily. Post at least one new thing per day to keep things fresh and active. It is essential to be consistent. Facebook’s algorithm rewards consistent engagement—the more your members like, share, and click on your posts, the more they will be seen.
  • Be relevant. Above all else, post items that your members will love. Celebrate your successes and actions.Connect emotionally with your members and they will engage.

Post Clear Calls to Action (CTAs)

  • CTAs lead to action. Ideally your posts will ask your members to act. Sharing information is good; inspiring action is better. This is just like when you call your elected officials —voicing an opinion is good but presenting an “ask” is better.
  • Make CTAs stand out. Make sure your CTAs are always extremely obvious and clearly visible. For example, use simple text formatting: “CALL TO ACTION: …” or “TO DO: …” If possible, create a standard visual treatment (graphic) for “Action” or “Let’s Show Up” requests so they stand out from everything else.
  • Place important info at the top. Put the time, location, the action requested and other important details at the very top of the post so it won’t get clipped (Facebook only shows a couple lines of text by default).
  • Keep to a schedule. Many groups post CTAs once a week, like on Sunday, and post additional “red alert” CTAs as needed. Other larger, more active groups may post daily actions.

Small Facebook Group Management Best Practices

These recommendations apply to Facebook groups with less than 100 active members.

  • Group Admins. Appoint at least one group admin to manage the group’s Facebook account (using their personal accounts).
  • Always have a backup. Make sure someone else has account access and can run the group in the absence of the main Facebook admin. Some groups have been devastated when a group admin unexpectedly lost contact with the group without transferring the account.

Tactics for Making Sure Members (and Others) See Posts

Facebook uses a complex, ever-changing algorithm to determine which posts each user sees, and how high up they are on their feed, and when they get sent out. You can use some simple tactics to increase how often your posts are seen.

  • Add comments to posts/ Sharing your posts. Encourage members to leave a comment on CTAs (“done” or “called”), events or other important posts, or share the post itself. The Facebook algorithm will see the activity, assume it must be an interesting post, and then send it to more people.
  • Cutting & pasting posts. Some groups instruct members to cut and paste posts and repost them. This makes it much more likely that members’ friends who don’t follow your group will see them.
  • Remind members to visit the group’s page. The group’s page contains time-sensitive information about events and actions that may get lost on members’ feeds. Actively encourage members to check back regularly with the group’s page.
  • When it’s really urgent, don’t rely on Facebook. The tactics above will increase your success rate, but you can never reach everyone—and even if you do, they won’t see your post until the next time they happen to check Facebook. For rare, truly urgent messages, you still need a mailing list or another communications solution.

Large Facebook Group Management Best Practices

These recommendations apply to Facebook groups with more than 100 active members.

  • Group Admins, Editors & Moderators. At a minimum, have 3-5 people to manage the group’s Facebook Group:
  • 1-2 people managing publishing and moderating the group
  • 1-2 people vetting new recruits
  • 1 person managing the group’s calendar
  • Control posting. Limit members’ ability to post items and/or create an approval workflow involving admins approving new posts. For very large groups, only allow admins to post to prevent “flooding.” When a group is “flooded” with messages, Facebook does not always show posts in members’ feeds which may prevent important posts from being seen.
  • Heavy moderation. Larger groups are more in need of heavy moderation to shutdown the spread of fake news, bickering and other negative online behaviors. Moderators play an important role in keeping conversations friendly and should immediately intervene when people start arguing, imposing “purity tests,” or other negative interactions. For groups leading discussions on sensitive topics, some choose to set all comments to “require approval” by a moderator to keep the space safe for its users.
  • Editorial calendar. Some large groups find it useful to set up an editorial calendar to organize and optimize what posts go out when.
  • Get another event management / calendar tool​. You can only send event invites to all members of your Facebook group if it has less than 250 members. Otherwise, it will only send the invite to members who are your friends (you can manually add more individual names but this is impractical). When your group grows above 250, consider using a more robust calendaring tool like Google Calendar or, Eventbrite.

Address Privacy Concerns Proactively

  • Privacy ground rules. Clearly state the group’s privacy rules in the group’s information page and have moderators make sure members do not share each others’ personal information or share each other’s posts without permission.
  • Remind members about privacy, even if your group is secret. Moderators should remind group members periodically that no matter how “private” or “secret” their group is, they should be careful of what they post.
  • Example: We treat Facebook as more-or-less private, but nothing is ever100% secure, and being political activists makes us more of a target than the average person. So, as a personal rule, please “assume it will leak and be on the front page of the New York Times.”
  • Educate members. Encourage members to learn about Facebook’s privacy settings and adjust them. Facebook Tutorial: Facebook Privacy Checkup.

Tricky parts/ fixes

Your members could miss important posts.

You cannot guarantee that a post on Facebook will be seen by all your members! Even those who use it constantly will miss posts because of how Facebook’s feed works. For critical communications that you want delivered promptly to every member of your group, use an email list.

By Blueprints for Change

Email Best Practices

Image by Muhammad Ribkhan from Pixabay

Email is the dominant engagement channel for most organizations. A well-designed email program should be at the heart of your communication strategy.

By Organise Us

For every 1,000 email subscribers, the average nonprofit has 428 Facebook fans, 141 Twitter followers, and 39 Instagram followers. On average, a nonprofit will reach just 8% of its fans on Facebook with a post that isn’t promoted.

Email offers a long-term relationship with your supporters. But know this: On average, people receive 76 emails per day. Yes, they’re in multiple relationships with multiple organizations at any one time. Take them for granted or send them the same calling cards as their other dates? They’ll dump you as fast as they can hit the unsubscribe button!

Let’s take a look through our email behaviour:

  1. In 2016, Nonprofits sent 10% more email than 2015. On average, nonprofits sent 24 fundraising emails, 20 advocacy emails and 11 e-newsletters per subscriber.
  2. Advocacy email action rates average 1.6%. Open rates average 13% & click-through rates 1.91%.
  3. Fundraising email action rates average 0.05%. On average, nonprofits receive one donation for every 2,000 fundraising messages sent. The average donation is $36. Fundraising email open rates average 13% while click-through rates average 0.38%.
  4. Advocacy landing page completion rates average 74% and fundraising completion rates average 17%.
  5. Email accounted for 26% of all online revenue in 2016.

From who? Keep it personal

Almost two-thirds of readers open emails based on the “from” address, whereas only a quarter opened based on the subject line.

The person who “sends” the email from your organization – the “from” address, and personalized name – needs to be recognizsable and, ideally, reputable. Always use a personalized email that people can reply to. For example use: “tabatha@nullorganiseus.com.au” not “noreply@nullroganiseus.com.au”.

Subject Lines

The first goal set by the Obama digital team during his election campaigns was to grab your attention long enough to get you to open the email. Toby Fallsgraff, Obama’s 2012 campaign email director explains, “The subject lines that worked the best were things you might see in your inbox from other people. ‘Hey’ was probably the best one we had over the duration.”

Consider the lifetime value of your supporter (and email list) and how they meet with your content, brand, story and actions.

The most effective subject lines evoke one or more of these themes and emotions:

  • Self-interest
  • Curiosity
  • Novelty
  • Urgency
  • Humanity
  • News
  • Social proof
  • Story

And how do you figure out what works? Test! Test! Test!

They opened the email. Now what?

Here are three core principles that form the basis of a successful email. (Success = the action you want them to take is taken).

1. CRISI-TUNITY

The crisi-tunity is what creates the tension in an email that leads the reader to act. Just like a good story, an email needs tension to create a sense of momentum. “We’re working night and day to protect the earth”. What does this sentence lack? That’s right – tension.

For example:
<crisis>
Early this morning President Bush vetoed the expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, cancelling lifesaving care for over 3.8 million children.</crisis> <opportunity>But a large, bi-partisan majority of Congress strongly favours the health care expansion. If we speak out now, Congress could overturn Bush’s veto — restoring care for millions of children and ending Bush’s assault on the programs vulnerable Americans depend on.</opportunity>

2. READER-FOCUSED THEORY OF CHANGE

By putting the supporter at the heart of the theory of change in the email, the reader is able to see how by taking the action, the change you are describing will actually happen. Paint a picture in which they can see themselves as a vital figure.

  • This theory of change is too abstract and has no tangible urgency for the supporter
    “Climate change threatens our very way of life.”
  • The supporter is completely missing in this theory of change
    “Child poverty is terrible, and we’ve launched a petition to stop it.”
  • This theory of change is totally impossible
    “Tony Abbott has staked his leadership on stopping the boats. So we’ve launched a petition to change his mind.”

3. AUTHENTICITY

Be authentic. Be genuine. Your supporters joined your cause for a reason. You are in a relationship with them based on shared values. Connect with them on that basis. Remind them how important they are. Make it about them and what we can do together, not just about you and what you need from them.

How to structure an email

Good email is highly structured. Good email is focused. Good email creates a flow that engages the reader in the issue and inspires them to take the action you’ve designed.

After you’ve nailed the structure, and are following these simple principles, your email program will start writing itself.

  • Establish a suite of ‘’active voices’’– campaign manager, CEO, the person closest to the action, trusted surrogates. Your email should come from a human.
  • What’s your user-centered theory of change? Spell out why supporters should spend their time on this ask. Prove it’s plausible and worth it for them (not for us). It’s about “you”, “we” and “us” doing things – not them supporting x org to do things for them.
  • Develop a tone that suits the voice of the organization/issue – personal, casual, as if written to a friend, not formal.
  • And remember – only use bolding to highlight key phrases of the text but not entire paragraphs. Italics can emphasize the odd word, be conversational.

A good email structure example

[The Sender – First name, last name, org]
Simon Brand, CCAC
[The Subject line – keep it short. Goal is to get email opened. One to eight words]
Are you in?

[The Salutation – casual, first name, ‘Hi’ not ‘Dear’]
Hi Tabatha,

[The Challenge – what’s the problem, refer to antagonist, what’s the barrier to change? Be succinct, aim to describe the challenge, solution and ask in 150 words before the first link.]
We knew it was coming. On Monday, a $10 million industry-funded “Say No” campaign will launch. This means a Say No advertisement running in almost every prime-time advertising slot. On top of this, sections of the media remain hostile when it comes to putting a price on pollution.

[The Solution – plausible, starts with us, share the strategy, include other protagonists/supporting actors]
So, how are we responding? Before you say “not another rally!” don’t worry, we’re not repeating the same tactic. This is all about grassroots – our biggest strength and what the naysayers like to pretend they have, but don’t. We’ll be connecting with the community. We’re pretty sure people trust their friends and neighbours more than scare from mining magnates and shock jocks.

[The first link – needs to be visible without scrolling down. Should be a hyperlinked text, button or image]
Are you with us? I’m in!

[The Ask – simple, key to the ‘solution’, winnable, believable theory of change]
We’ve got community action planned across the country in August, starting with letter boxing our neighbourhoods. We want hundreds of you who are reading this email to volunteer to work with others to letterbox a neighbourhood. Are you in? [The second link – should be hyperlinked, active text like this can also be a friendly url link to copy & paste like this www.acfonline.org.au/I’m_In]
I’m in.

[The Back up – why now, if not before? Further develop antagonist]
We’re building a peak in our campaign bigger than the last, to show the depth of support for the price on pollution. And it’s happening soon – before our MPs return from recess to begin debating the package.

[Further illustration of the ask – personal stories, target, # of actions, urgency, deadline, show don’t tell]
Can letter boxing make a difference? Check out this story from our “Camp Yes!” graduate, Jarren: “A friend came over last night. He told me when he arrived at work that morning, everyone was talking about the carbon tax. He was dragged over to the noticeboard to look at a letter. The letter had my name on it. One girl was so impressed by the letter that I’d delivered to her house, she took it to work and posted it up for everyone to see. Our boss read it, and loved it so much she requested all her employees go read it. This sparked up a big conversation in support of the carbon price.”

Will you join Jarren and letterbox in your neighbourhood? [The third link – repeat the link at the end of the email]
I’m in.

[The Sign Off – use a friendly word like ‘Regards’ or a phrase like ‘Thanks for being part of this’, not formalities like ‘Yours sincerely’]
We’ll support you all the way,
Simon Brand,
Climate Team, CCAC

[The PS – fresh take for a different audience, add a final link if possible]
PS. Last week, you called for carbon capture to be kept out of the clean energy finance corporation. We flooded MPs with messages asking them to “keep it clean.” It worked! The $10 billion finance corporation could unlock $100 billion of investment in clean energy. [The fourth link – repeat the link at the end of the email]
Let’s keep it up!

One hyperlink

That’s right – only ONE link destination, rinsed and repeated two or three times. More than one hyperlink destination? Ask yourself, why am I sending this email? What’s the ONE thing I want to engage my audience to do? Then ask them to do that one thing.

Your best friend – the A/B test

A/B split testing is the comparison of two components with a single variation. A portion of your list receives one variation, the other portion receives another. The winning result is then sent to the full list.

Campaign communications can be fast and furious, but even in the frenzy of quick-turnaround actions, testing is still your friend. When testing is baked into your daily work, you can optimise your content, and your conversion and engagement will be all the better for it. Testing will help you increase deliverability and keep your list active.

Make sure you are selecting your sample randomly from your list and only conduct one test at a time (one variable at a time – a subject, or an image test, not both) so you can be crystal clear on the winning variable.

OU-emailblog-dummy3.png

But! Know when to ignore your test result!

The metrics (what you’re measuring) that you pay attention to will depend on the function of each email. First ask yourself: what’s the purpose of this email? To get your supporters to take an action? Raise brand awareness? Acquire a donation? Base what you’re testing on the desired outcome you want. You asked them to sign something – measure your action rate. You’re working on brand awareness – measure the open/click through rate.

SEGMENT

A good, engaging email program segments every single email to a selected, defined list. How you segment your data list is dependent on a variety of factors that are unique to your supporter base and your goals.

Ask yourself:

  • Who is your audience?
  • Where on their journey are they with you?
  • How will you meaningfully track engagement?

If you respect the individual and tailor your communications based on their engagement and activity with your cause, they will love you more!

PLAN, CHECK, CHECK AGAIN

You’ve drafted your email, looked at the data, segmented your list, tailored your content accordingly, and are feeling confident your email has a reader-focused theory of change with just one clearly defined ask/call to action.

Before you hit send!:

  • Read your email out loud. You will hear mistakes you can’t see and improve your written conversational style.
  • Develop an email draft, proof, approval process: use two different proof readers, reading the test email on different browsers, proof for final errors (not rewrites) before sending.
  • Test all links.
  • Preview your subject line.
  • AB test? Send, wait, analyze, send highest performing email.

Remember – sometimes it will go wrong. Don’t panic. Instead, see if you can make your mistake work for you. Apologies can be a great opportunity to get real and personal with your supporter.

The apology email below is a great example from our friends at Greenpeace Australia Pacific. They turned a simple mistake – calling everyone the wrong name – into a follow up apology donation ask, that brought in more revenue!

Email Tips

Image: Courtesy of Pixabay

Here are some email tips and a worksheet to help you plan when writing to or asking something of your supporters.

Write an email asking people to do something specific
  • Sending emails to a list of people is a great way to keep in contact and ask them to specific things like signing petitions and coming to events.

Plan your email

Before you start writing, make sure you know what you’re asking for and why:

Before you press send

  • Ask someone with fresh eyes to proofread your email
  • Check all the details (dates, times, contact details) are correct
  • Make sure all hyperlinks work

Other rules (only to be broken with good reason!)

  • Good email is highly structured! Follow this guide.
  • Think about what makes life easier for the reader, not what makes life easier for us!
  • If we are trying to get someone to do something, we should ask them clearly to do that thing, and the fewer different asks the better. Lots of options is easier for us but overwhelming for the reader, and the more options we provide the less likely the reader is to do any of them.
  • Only ONE hyperlink destination, which may be repeated two or three times.
  • This is not a newsletter, with lots of different options, it is a single ask email.
    ○ The exception is if there’s a step-down ask – something to do if the person can’t do what we most want
  • Use the email to say what you want to say – don’t put the content in an attachment. That forces the reader to open a second thing just to read what you have to say!
  • Emails come from a person, e.g. Helen, ACF Community Darebin
  • Is there a user-centered theory of change? Spell out why our supporters should spend their time on this ask. Prove why it is plausible and worth it FOR THEM (not for your group). How will it make a difference to what they care about?
  • For the same reason, it’s about “you”, “we” and “us” doing things – not them to doing us a favor.
  • Tone is personal, casual, to a friend, not formal.
  • Yes you really do have to tell the challenge, solution and ask in 150 words before the first link.
  • Use bold letters to highlight key phrases of the text but not entire paragraphs. Italics can emphasize the odd word, like you would if you were talking.
  • NO HEADLINES in an email – there is a subject line for that.

By Australian Conservation Foundation

Purpose-driven Campaigning

Image by Mohamed Hassan on Pixabay

This is an excerpt from Pastor Rick Warren’s bestselling book The Purpose Driven Church.

The book’s core premise is that you must ensure your organization (and every department, budget sheet and staff member in it) is driven to achieve the core purpose of the organization/ movement. Sounds easy and self-explanatory, right? Yes, but it’s harder to implement than you think. Too many nonprofits are being pulled in so many different directions that they aren’t really kicking goals in their core purpose any more; and some can’t even remember what that purpose was in the first place!

By Nick Moraitis

The importance of purpose

Nothing precedes purpose. The starting point for every organization or movement should be the question ‘Why do we exist’?

If you serve in an existing organization that has plateaued, is declining or is simply discouraged your most important task is to redefine your purpose.

If the leadership can’t even agree on why the organization exists, conflict and disagreement on everything else is inevitable.
A clear purpose builds morale.

A clear purpose not only defines what we do, it defines what we do not do. Once your purpose is set, decision making becomes far easier and less frustrating.

There is no correlation between the size and the strength of your organization. An organization can be big and strong, or big and flabby. Big is not necessarily better – better is better.

Share strategy

A clear purpose attracts cooperation – people want to join an organization that knows where it is going. When an organization clearly communicates its destination, people are eager to get onboard.

If you want your members to get excited about the organization, actively support it, and generously give to it, you must vividly explain up front exactly where the organization is heading.

Clearly explain your strategy and structure- this will keep people from joining the membership with false assumptions. Explaining your organization’s purposes to people before they join will not only reduce conflict and disappointment in your organization, it will also help some people realize they should join another organization because of philosophy or taste.

This is especially important when going through change – or when recruiting people who have been part of other organizations.

Focus

Focused light has tremendous power. Diffused light has no power and all. Like a laser beam, the more focused your organization becomes, the more impact it will have on society.

Don’t fall for the trap of ‘majoring in the minors’. This is when your organization becomes distracted by good, but less important agendas, crusades and purposes. The energy of the organization is diffused and then dissipated; the power is lost.

Most organizations try to do too much – dabble in forty different things and miss being good at any of them.

The older an organization gets, the truer this becomes – programs and events continue to be added to the agenda without ever cutting anything out.

The question to ask is ‘Would we begin this today if we were not already doing it?’

Restate purpose at least monthly

It is amazing how quickly human beings – and organizations – lose their sense of purpose. Vision and purpose must be restarted every twenty-six days to keep the organization moving in the right direction.

This is the foremost responsibility of leadership – if you fail to communicate your statement of purpose to your members you may as well not have one.

The vision of any organization always fades with time unless it is reinforced. This is because people become distracted by other things. By continually fanning the figure of your purposes you can overcome the tendency of your organization to become complacent or discouraged.

Ways to communicate vision and purpose

Symbols

Slogans – ‘History has proven that a simple slogan, repeatedly shared with conviction, can motivate people to do things they would normally never do’’.

Stories
  • Use stories to dramatize the purpose of your organization.
  • Share actual testimonials or letters from real people.
  • Organizational legends (historical within the org).
Specifics
  • Always give practical clear, concrete action steps that explain exactly how your organization intends to fulfill its purpose. Offer a detailed plan for implementing your purpose.
  • Remember nothing becomes dynamic until it becomes specific. When a vision is vague it holds no attraction. The more specific your organization’s vision is, the more it will grab attention and attract a commitment. The most specific way to communicate the purpose is to apply it personally to how each member lives.
Personalize
  • Member at the center of the story.

Be purpose/mission driven. Don’t be driven by:

Tradition
  • The seven last words of an organization are: ‘We’ve never done it that way before’.
Personality
  • Where the agenda is determined more by the background, needs and insecurities of the leader.
Finances
  • Finances must never be the controlling issue.
  • Rick Warren notes that many churches are driven by faith in their early years and by finances in later years. This is applicable to non profits!
Programs
  • Often the program-driven organization’s goal subtly shifts from developing people to just filling positions. If results from a program diminish, the people blame themselves for not working hard enough. No one ever questions if a program still works.
Buildings
  • The tail ends up wagging the dog
Events
  • Meetings! What is the purpose behind them all?
  • Attendance becomes the sole measurement of success.
Seekers
  • Should be seeker (new recruit) sensitive, but not seeker driven.

Considering whether you are really achieving your mission

Are you being faithful to your mission if you insist on communicating in an outdated style?
Are you being faithful to your mission if you insist on doing things in a way that is comfortable for you even though it doesn’t produce any results?
We must be willing to say with unreserved commitment, ‘We’ll do whatever it takes to reach people’.

Apply purpose principles throughout the organization

  • A purpose driven organization must rigorously apply its purposes to every part of the organization – programming, scheduling, budgeting, staffing.
  • When thinking about finances, people give to vision.

How Much should your Donation Ask be?

Photo by Amber Avalona on Pixabay

For the 2013 federal election, an ask was put out to the GetUp list asking for donations to fund election advertising. The list was split into three groups:

  • those who have never donated,
  • those who have donated large amounts (over $400) before,
  • and other donors.

The group of people who have given large amounts is quite small, and thus the focus was on the other two groups. In both cases, we split the lists in half (roughly). All recipients received the same email, but the default donation ask on the page they clicked on was different. One confounding factor was that donation pages had very slightly different page names. All other content was consistent.

  • For non-donors, the amounts were either $5 or $30.
  • For donors, the amounts were either $30 or $70.

There is evidence that the increased default ask was effective for previous donors. While the number of members to donate was less for the $70 ask (14.7% of clicks, as against 15.1%), the average amount donated was higher ($71 vs $51), and the total amount raised was higher.

  • The $70 ask resulted in $10.50 raised per person who clicked on the page.
  • The $30 ask resulted in $7.70 per click.

There was a hope that reducing the default ask for non-donors from $30 to $5 would result in a larger number of donors giving money, which would hopefully result in an increase amount of money raised, even if the average donation was smaller.

However, non-donors were slightly less likely to donate on the page with the $5 default ask (3.2% of clicks) as compared to the $30 default ask (3.3%). The average donation was also lower for the $5 default ask ($37 vs $47).

  • The $30 ask resulted in $1.55 raised per person who clicked on the page.
  • The $5 ask resulted in $1.16 per click.

This experiment shows evidence for the idea that pre-existing donors have the potential to increase their donations with a relatively small impact on the number of donors giving money. No evidence is apparent that a very low default ask on the donation page is effective at broadening the number of donors.

There are a couple of design elements which may be hindering any potential for this to be more effective:

  • Flagging default donation asks in email – Non-donors may not be clicking on the link, as the email does not refer to the default ask, and someone who may be more willing to donate if a smaller ask is made may already be deterred before getting to the page.
  • Changing position of donation form so person selects their dollar amount before giving credit card details – at the moment the form asks for the dollar amount at the end, and on a 13-inch laptop screen this part normally does not appear without scrolling. May result in people being deterred before realizing that the ask is for only $5.

It is also possible that more sophisticated division of the GetUp list could be helpful in effectively differentiating GetUp members to determine the ideal default ask.

By Ben Raue, Online Progressive Engagement Network